The overall picture of Tesla’s attitude toward autonomous driving features is deeply troubling. Musk has brushed aside eye-tracking systems as being ineffective and expensive, but Consumer Reports found them to be far superior to torque-monitoring systems in a recent comparison. Much more effective are eye-tracking systems that can monitor the angle of a driver’s head and the movement of her face. But Trump officials have shown no interest in clarifying things.
#Easy mark labeling software crack drivers
A study from AAA found that drivers assumed higher functionality in a fictitious ADAS product called “AutonoDrive” than in an identical one named “DriveAssist” in the real world, names like “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving” could lead drivers to overestimate their systems’ capabilities and pay less attention while in the driver’s seat. Other carmakers have adopted their own flashy names for their ADAS systems, including Cadillac’s Super Cruise and Ford’s Co-Pilot 360. “The real name should be anything but that,” said Duke engineering professor Missy Cummings, who has studied autonomous technologies extensively.
#Easy mark labeling software crack full
Indeed, European regulators bluntly concluded that “Tesla’s system name Autopilot is inappropriate as it suggests full automation.” Musk disagrees he recently called the idea of changing it “idiotic.” As misleading as “Autopilot” may be, the term “Full Self-Driving” seems even worse.
That kind of vigilance doesn’t jibe with a term like “Autopilot,” which suggests a vehicle that can operate independently.
0 kommentar(er)
